This idiom describes an individual excessively eager and enthusiastic, perhaps overly prepared, for a legal proceeding. Imagine a litigant arriving not just with all necessary documents but with a flamboyant and attention-seeking demeanor, metaphorically ringing bells to announce their presence and confidence. This can signify genuine zeal, a desire to intimidate, or even a misguided attempt to influence the court through performative display.
Such demonstrative behavior can be a double-edged sword. While conveying confidence and commitment, it can also be perceived as disruptive, disrespectful, or even indicative of a lack of seriousness. The historical context of the phrase likely stems from a time when more overt displays of emotion and intention were common in public life. Today, such theatrics might be interpreted negatively within the formal setting of a courtroom. Understanding this nuanced meaning helps interpret motivations and potential outcomes in legal scenarios.
