Within the context of the film Who Framed Roger Rabbit, “to frame” someone carries a dual meaning. First, it refers to the act of falsely incriminating an individual for a crime they did not commit. This is the central plot device, driving the narrative and creating suspense as Roger Rabbit is wrongly accused of murder. Secondly, acknowledging the film’s blend of animation and live-action, “framing” also alludes to the cinematic technique of composing a shot, literally placing the cartoon characters within the confines of the film frame alongside real actors.
The double entendre of this term is crucial to understanding the film’s narrative and thematic depth. It underscores the vulnerability of Roger Rabbit, a cartoon character existing within a world where he can be manipulated and exploited. Furthermore, the interplay between these two definitions highlights the filmmaking process itself, drawing attention to the innovative techniques used to integrate animation and live-action. The deliberate ambiguity enriches the viewing experience, adding layers of meaning beyond the surface plot.
